linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170817213602.GC19276@fury>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:36:02 -0700
From:   Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:     Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance
 number

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 17 August 2017 08:24:31 Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > instance_count defines number of instances of data block and instance
> > > itself is indexed from zero, which means first instance has number 0.
> > > Therefore check for invalid instance should be non-strict inequality.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
> > 
> > This is correct per the WMI specification. Pali, now that Andy has
> > applied 1-3 of this series, is that all the required driver updates?
> 
> Hmmm... I have not understood your question.
> 
> I checked that all drivers which uses instance id 1 have comment
> explaining why is id 1 used.
> 
> Problematic drivers without comment have either patch to use instance id
> 0 in this series or somebody else already supplied patch which is part
> of linus tree.

Perfect, that is what I was looking for. Thanks Pali!

> 
> > Reviewed-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@...radead.org>
-- 
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center