linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] selftests: timers: freq-step: Fix build warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3163346d-a9a5-c0b4-b216-9f483c6ae55e@osg.samsung.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Aug 2017 21:53:53 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc:     Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] selftests: timers: freq-step: Fix build warning

On 08/16/2017 09:31 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:10 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> On 08/15/2017 06:11 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 02:01:36PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>>>>> Fixes the following build warning:
>>>>> freq-step.c: In function ‘main’:
>>>>> freq-step.c:271:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -268,4 +268,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>>>              ksft_exit_fail();
>>>
>>> This needs to be changes as well to return ksft_exit_fail();
>>>>>
>>>>>      ksft_exit_pass();
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    return 0;
>>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> It seems most tests use "return ksft_exit_pass();". Would that be
>>>> preferred over separate return? I don't have a preference.
>>>
>>> Let's go with "return ksft_exit_pass();"
>>
>> Thanks for the review, I've made both changes and I'll send these out
>> shortly with the rest of my 4.14 focused queue.
> 
> Shuah,
>   One more question here. I'm noticing that running "make
> run_destructive_tests" in the timers dir, the freq-step test returns
> ksft_exit_skip, which results in the test returning an exit code of 4,
> which causes make to think it failed, halting the testing.

I think exit code 4 might not be good option. It could be tripping the
make target rules.

> 
> I'm guessing there is some extra logic for how to properly run
> extended tests such that the various error codes are handled and a
> skip doesn't result in the test stopping?
> 
> Any suggestions/pointers?
> 

Skip is really a case of not being able to run the test and it might not
be necessary to differentiate SKIP vs. PASS. I think we can just get rid 
of EXIT_SKIP and use EXIT_PASS. I would rather do that than adding handling
for exit code 4.

I can get that change in for 4.14-rc1 if this can wait or I will try to get
that into 4.13-rc7 possibly.

Also just FYI - I am going to send out patch series for timers test conversion
to TAP13 tomorrow.

thanks,
-- Shuah