lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170817220947.GA4731@arbeit>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:09:47 +0200
From:   Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
To:     jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de,
        pmeerw@...erw.net, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, hdegoede@...hat.com, wsa@...-dreams.de,
        chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz, jelle@...aa.nl,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] iio: srf08: add sensor type srf10

Ultrasonic sensor srf10 is quite similar to srf08 and now also supported by
the driver as device tree compatible string.

It was necessary to prepare the source for supplementary sensors. This is
done by enum srf08_sensor_type.

The most significiant difference between srf08 and srf10 is another range
and values of register gain (in the driver it's call sensitivity).
Therefore the array of it is extended and dependent of the sensor type.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
---
 drivers/iio/proximity/Kconfig |  4 +-
 drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/proximity/Kconfig
index 5b81a8c9d438..df33ccc0d035 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/proximity/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/Kconfig
@@ -57,10 +57,10 @@ config SX9500
 	  module will be called sx9500.
 
 config SRF08
-	tristate "Devantech SRF08 ultrasonic ranger sensor"
+	tristate "Devantech SRF08/SRF10 ultrasonic ranger sensor"
 	depends on I2C
 	help
-	  Say Y here to build a driver for Devantech SRF08 ultrasonic
+	  Say Y here to build a driver for Devantech SRF08/SRF10 ultrasonic
 	  ranger sensor. This driver can be used to measure the distance
 	  of objects.
 
diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
index de699d67310a..1f9b03944da4 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 /*
- * srf08.c - Support for Devantech SRF08 ultrasonic ranger
+ * srf08.c - Support for Devantech SRFxx ultrasonic ranger
+ *           with i2c interface
+ * actually supported are srf08, srf10
  *
  * Copyright (c) 2016 Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
  *
@@ -9,6 +11,7 @@
  *
  * For details about the device see:
  * http://www.robot-electronics.co.uk/htm/srf08tech.html
+ * http://www.robot-electronics.co.uk/htm/srf10tech.htm
  */
 
 #include <linux/err.h>
@@ -33,9 +36,20 @@
 
 #define SRF08_CMD_RANGING_CM	0x51	/* Ranging Mode - Result in cm */
 
-#define SRF08_DEFAULT_GAIN	1025	/* default analogue value of Gain */
 #define SRF08_DEFAULT_RANGE	6020	/* default value of Range in mm */
 
+enum srf08_sensor_type {
+	SRF08,
+	SRF10,
+	SRF_MAX_TYPE
+};
+
+struct srf08_chip_info {
+	const int		*sensitivity_avail;
+	int			num_sensitivity_avail;
+	int			sensitivity_default;
+};
+
 struct srf08_data {
 	struct i2c_client	*client;
 
@@ -54,6 +68,12 @@ struct srf08_data {
 	 * 1x16-bit channel + 3x16 padding + 4x16 timestamp
 	 */
 	s16			buffer[8];
+
+	/* Sensor-Type */
+	enum srf08_sensor_type	sensor_type;
+
+	/* Chip-specific information */
+	const struct srf08_chip_info	*chip_info;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -63,11 +83,30 @@ struct srf08_data {
  * But with ADC's this term is already used differently and that's why it
  * is called "Sensitivity" here.
  */
-static const int srf08_sensitivity[] = {
+static const int srf08_sensitivity_avail[] = {
 	 94,  97, 100, 103, 107, 110, 114, 118,
 	123, 128, 133, 139, 145, 152, 159, 168,
 	177, 187, 199, 212, 227, 245, 265, 288,
-	317, 352, 395, 450, 524, 626, 777, 1025 };
+	317, 352, 395, 450, 524, 626, 777, 1025
+	};
+
+static const struct srf08_chip_info srf08_chip_info = {
+	.sensitivity_avail	= srf08_sensitivity_avail,
+	.num_sensitivity_avail	= ARRAY_SIZE(srf08_sensitivity_avail),
+	.sensitivity_default	= 1025,
+};
+
+static const int srf10_sensitivity_avail[] = {
+	 40,  40,  50,  60,  70,  80, 100, 120,
+	140, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 500, 600,
+	700,
+	};
+
+static const struct srf08_chip_info srf10_chip_info = {
+	.sensitivity_avail	= srf10_sensitivity_avail,
+	.num_sensitivity_avail	= ARRAY_SIZE(srf10_sensitivity_avail),
+	.sensitivity_default	= 700,
+};
 
 static int srf08_read_ranging(struct srf08_data *data)
 {
@@ -264,9 +303,13 @@ static ssize_t srf08_show_sensitivity_available(struct device *dev,
 				struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
 	int i, len = 0;
+	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
+	struct srf08_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(srf08_sensitivity); i++)
-		len += sprintf(buf + len, "%d ", srf08_sensitivity[i]);
+	for (i = 0; i < data->chip_info->num_sensitivity_avail; i++)
+		if (data->chip_info->sensitivity_avail[i])
+			len += sprintf(buf + len, "%d ",
+				data->chip_info->sensitivity_avail[i]);
 
 	len += sprintf(buf + len, "\n");
 
@@ -295,19 +338,21 @@ static ssize_t srf08_write_sensitivity(struct srf08_data *data,
 	int ret, i;
 	u8 regval;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(srf08_sensitivity); i++)
-		if (val == srf08_sensitivity[i]) {
+	if (!val)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < data->chip_info->num_sensitivity_avail; i++)
+		if (val && (val == data->chip_info->sensitivity_avail[i])) {
 			regval = i;
 			break;
 		}
 
-	if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(srf08_sensitivity))
+	if (i >= data->chip_info->num_sensitivity_avail)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&data->lock);
 
-	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
-						SRF08_WRITE_MAX_GAIN, regval);
+	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, SRF08_WRITE_MAX_GAIN, regval);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&client->dev, "write_sensitivity - err: %d\n", ret);
 		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
@@ -399,8 +444,20 @@ static int srf08_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 	data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
 	i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev);
 	data->client = client;
+	data->sensor_type = (enum srf08_sensor_type)id->driver_data;
+
+	switch (data->sensor_type) {
+	case SRF08:
+		data->chip_info = &srf08_chip_info;
+		break;
+	case SRF10:
+		data->chip_info = &srf10_chip_info;
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
-	indio_dev->name = "srf08";
+	indio_dev->name = id->name;
 	indio_dev->dev.parent = &client->dev;
 	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
 	indio_dev->info = &srf08_info;
@@ -425,7 +482,8 @@ static int srf08_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = srf08_write_sensitivity(data, SRF08_DEFAULT_GAIN);
+	ret = srf08_write_sensitivity(data,
+				data->chip_info->sensitivity_default);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -433,14 +491,16 @@ static int srf08_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 }
 
 static const struct of_device_id of_srf08_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "devantech,srf08", 0},
+	{ .compatible = "devantech,srf08", (void *)SRF08},
+	{ .compatible = "devantech,srf10", (void *)SRF10},
 	{},
 };
 
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_srf08_match);
 
 static const struct i2c_device_id srf08_id[] = {
-	{ "srf08", 0 },
+	{ "srf08", SRF08 },
+	{ "srf10", SRF10 },
 	{ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, srf08_id);
-- 
2.1.4


-- 
Andreas Klinger
Grabenreith 27
84508 Burgkirchen
+49 8623 919966
ak@...klinger.de
www.it-klinger.de
www.grabenreith.de

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ