[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53264562-fddf-8214-859c-0f491b2ca42a@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:20:41 +1000
From: Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@...il.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH][V2] drm/nouveau: perform null check on msto[i]
rathern than msto
On 08/18/2017 08:16 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 17/08/17 23:07, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>>
>>> The null check on the array msto is incorrect since msto is never
>>> null. The null check should be instead on msto[i] since this is
>>> being dereferenced in the call to drm_mode_connector_attach_encoder.
>>>
>>> Thanks to Emil Velikov for pointing out the mistake in my original
>>> fix and for suggesting the correct fix.
>>>
>>> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1375915 ("Array compared against 0")
>>>
>>> Fixes: f479c0ba4a17 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50: initial support for DP 1.2 multi-stream")
>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c
>>> index f7b4326a4641..ed444ecd9e85 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c
>>> @@ -3141,7 +3141,7 @@ nv50_mstc_new(struct nv50_mstm *mstm, struct drm_dp_mst_port *port,
>>> mstc->connector.funcs->reset(&mstc->connector);
>>> nouveau_conn_attach_properties(&mstc->connector);
>>>
>>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mstm->msto) && mstm->msto; i++)
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mstm->msto) && mstm->msto[i]; i++)
>>
>> Ben will have to rule on which way is correct, but another
>> interpretation is that it should be
>>
>> for (...; i < ARRAY_SIZE; i++)
>> if (mstm->msto[i])
>> do_stuff()
>
> Yes, I suspect that is a better generic solution top cope with potential
> "holes".
>>
>> I haven't the faintest clue whether the msto array can have "holes" or not.
>
> Indeed. Let's see what Ben says.
No, there can't be holes here. I believe the V2 patch to be correct.
Ben.
>
>
>>
>>> drm_mode_connector_attach_encoder(&mstc->connector, &mstm->msto[i]->encoder);
>>>
>>> drm_object_attach_property(&mstc->connector.base, dev->mode_config.path_property, 0);
>>> --
>>> 2.11.0
>>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists