[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQSfsc7kqd76moygWFs0CNQLJtzuFTRu0Hsm6eKDEt5LA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:46:12 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: dts: uniphier: UniPhier DT updates for v4.14
Hi Arnd,
2017-08-17 6:31 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> UniPhier ARM SoC DT updates for v4.14
>>
>> - complete migrating to SPDX License Identifier
>> - remove support for old SoC
>> - add nodes for NAND, Audio pinctrl
>> - replace /include/ with #include
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Katsuhiro Suzuki (1):
>> ARM: dts: uniphier: add audio out pin-mux node
>>
>> Masahiro Yamada (4):
>> ARM: dts: uniphier: use SPDX-License-Identifier (2nd)
>> ARM: dts: uniphier: remove sLD3 SoC support
>> ARM: dts: uniphier use #include instead of /include/
>> ARM: dts: uniphier: add Denali NAND controller node
>
> Pulled into next/dt, but please clarify one question:
>
> How likely is it that there are still users of the sLD3 SoC on
> mainline kernels? The commit just states that it is too hard
> to maintain, but the more important question is whether anyone
> cares about it breaking.
>
> Arnd
Nobody cared.
I tried to maintain it for completeness (then finally I gave up),
but nobody is using it.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists