[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1502929648-24137-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:27:28 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@....com
Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: Make LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE part of PROVE_LOCKING
I am not sure if I did as Ingo suggested. Is this what you intended?
----->8-----
>From 64c705bfedf45b2c56a0d2f4c65a998a1b730310 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:12:18 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: Make LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE part of PROVE_LOCKING
Crossrelease added the following two configs in Kconfig:
LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE depending on PROVE_LOCKING
LOCKDEP_COMPLETE depending on PROVE_LOCKING
Remove the dependencies and make them all part of PROVE_LOCKING, like
most of the other lock debugging bits.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
---
lib/Kconfig.debug | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index ee9e534..43ab713 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1084,6 +1084,8 @@ config PROVE_LOCKING
select DEBUG_MUTEXES
select DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES if RT_MUTEXES
select DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+ select LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE
+ select LOCKDEP_COMPLETE
select TRACE_IRQFLAGS
default n
help
@@ -1155,7 +1157,7 @@ config LOCK_STAT
config LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE
bool "Lock debugging: make lockdep work for crosslocks"
- depends on PROVE_LOCKING
+ depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
default n
help
This makes lockdep work for crosslock which is a lock allowed to
@@ -1167,7 +1169,7 @@ config LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE
config LOCKDEP_COMPLETE
bool "Lock debugging: allow completions to use deadlock detector"
- depends on PROVE_LOCKING
+ depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
select LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE
default n
help
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists