[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170817114349.uxtossvvaccuwy5g@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:43:49 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: will.deacon@....com, zjzhang@...eaurora.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, tbaicar@...eaurora.org,
james.morse@....com, geliangtang@...il.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
austinwc@...eaurora.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxarm@...wei.com, john.garry@...wei.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com,
zhengqiang10@...wei.com, wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com,
huangshaoyu@...wei.com, wuquanming@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] acpi: apei: fix the wrong iteration of generic error
status block
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 08:07:18PM +0800, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> The revision 0x300 generic error data entry is different
> from the old version, but currently iterating through the
> GHES estatus blocks does not take into account this difference.
> This will lead to failure to get the right data entry if GHES
> has revision 0x300 error data entry.
>
> Update the GHES estatus iteration to properly increment using
> iteration macro,
This is not what I meant - I meant:
"Update the GHES estatus iteration macro to properly increment using
acpi_hest_get_next(), and ..."
But you don't need to send another version.
Rafael, please correct that when applying, instead.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists