[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1502978566.15969.308.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:02:47 +0000
From: "Coelho, Luciano" <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
To: "jikos@...nel.org" <jikos@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxwifi <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"Weinehall, David" <david.weinehall@...el.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>,
"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
"kvalo@...eaurora.org" <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"Sharon, Sara" <sara.sharon@...el.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [linuxwifi] x86/thermal: AB-BA dependency between mvm->mutex
and tz->lock
On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 15:38 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anything new on this front please?
>
> The splat (and therefore deadlock potential) is still there with current
> Linus' tree.
Sorry, haven't had more time to spend on it. I'll do it this evening.
But, just to clarify, the deadlock potential has been there for a while,
right? The only difference is that now we get the splat.
Not saying we shouldn't fix it though. ;)
--
Luca.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists