[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170817125140.7d705af8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 12:51:40 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the security tree
Hi James,
After merging the security tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c:12:0:
samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c: In function 'main':
samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.h:47:26: error: 'SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD' undeclared (first use in this function)
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD)
^
./usr/include/linux/filter.h:48:59: note: in definition of macro 'BPF_STMT'
#define BPF_STMT(code, k) { (unsigned short)(code), 0, 0, k }
^
samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c:41:3: note: in expansion of macro 'DENY'
DENY, /* Don't passthrough into a label */
^~~~
samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.h:47:26: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD)
^
./usr/include/linux/filter.h:48:59: note: in definition of macro 'BPF_STMT'
#define BPF_STMT(code, k) { (unsigned short)(code), 0, 0, k }
^
samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c:41:3: note: in expansion of macro 'DENY'
DENY, /* Don't passthrough into a label */
^~~~
[Note: this is a cross build, if that is relevant ...]
Presumably caused by commit
fd76875ca289 ("seccomp: Rename SECCOMP_RET_KILL to SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD")
I have used the security tree from next-20170816 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists