[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170817151025.sdbusesfq7spy4fm@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:10:25 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: "David.Wu" <david.wu@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
heiko@...ech.de, mark.rutland@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, olof@...om.net, linux@...linux.org.uk,
arnd@...db.de, peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
huangtao@...k-chips.com, hwg@...k-chips.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] Documentation: net: phy: Add phy-is-internal
binding
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:57:40PM +0800, David.Wu wrote:
> Hi Andrew, Florian
>
> 在 2017/8/10 8:20, Andrew Lunn 写道:
> > Hi Florian, David.
> >
> > I'm happy with the property name. But i think the text needs more
> > description. We deal with Ethernet switches with integrated PHYs. Yet
> > for us, this property is unneeded.
> >
> > Seeing this property means some bit of software needs to ensure the
> > internal PHY should be used, when given the choice between an internal
> > and external PHY. So i would say something like:
> >
> > If set, indicates that the PHY is integrated into the same
> > physical package as the Ethernet MAC. If needed, muxers should be
> > configured to ensure the (internal) PHY is used. The absence of this
> > property indicates the muxers should be configured so that the
> > external PHY is used.
>
> Are we supposed to replace the words "internal" with "integrated" here?
> So we have three kinds of PHY, they are intenal, external and integrated
> PHYs.
And you can have both a XAUI/serdes phy and the ethernet phy. It should
be clear this is for the latter.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists