linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RESEND] of: return of_get_cpu_node from of_cpu_device_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:49:11 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] of: return of_get_cpu_node from
 of_cpu_device_node_get if CPUs are not registered

Hi Rob,

On 14/08/17 17:18, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Instead of the callsites choosing between of_cpu_device_node_get if the
> CPUs are registered as of_node is populated by then and of_get_cpu_node
> when the CPUs are not yet registered as CPU of_nodes are not yet stashed
> thereby needing to parse the device tree, we can call of_get_cpu_node
> in case the CPUs are not yet registered in of_cpu_device_node_get.
> 
> This will allow to use of_cpu_device_node_get anywhere hiding the
> details from the caller.
> 
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> ---
>  include/linux/of_device.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Hi Rob,
> 
> You have already acked this patch, but I wanted you to pick up this via
> your tree and hence I am resending it. I tried pinging on that thread
> but I can understand that it's lost in your mailbox :)
> 

Gentle ping!

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep