linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: dt: Add support for some new Allwinner SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v65rP_+qCvW5vJuwGxB8ebQZD462M3naPMxJ_8LeA0YMww@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2017 01:03:19 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: dt: Add support for some new Allwinner SoCs

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 7:42:19 AM CEST Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>>> > On Monday, July 24, 2017 02:23:49 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> >> On 23-07-17, 18:27, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>> >> > Some new Allwinner SoCs get supported in the kernel after the
>>> >> > compatibles are added to cpufreq-dt-platdev driver.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Add their compatible strings in the cpufreq-dt-platdev driver.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
>>> >> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>>> >> > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
>>> >> > ---
>>> >> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 6 ++++++
>>> >> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>>> >> > index 2eb40d46d357..c3851453e84a 100644
>>> >> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>>> >> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>>> >> > @@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ static const struct of_device_id machines[] __initconst = {
>>> >> >     { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23", },
>>> >> >     { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33", },
>>> >> >     { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t", },
>>> >> > +   { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h2-plus", },
>>> >> >     { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3", },
>>> >> > +   { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-v3s", },
>>> >> > +   { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64", },
>>> >> > +   { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5", },
>>> >> >
>>> >> >     { .compatible = "apm,xgene-shadowcat", },
>>> >> >
>>> >> > @@ -43,6 +47,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id machines[] __initconst = {
>>> >> >     { .compatible = "marvell,pxa250", },
>>> >> >     { .compatible = "marvell,pxa270", },
>>> >> >
>>> >> > +   { .compatible = "nextthing,gr8", },
>>> >> > +
>>> >> >     { .compatible = "samsung,exynos3250", },
>>> >> >     { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210", },
>>> >> >     { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212", },
>>> >>
>>> >> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > OK
>>> >
>>> > I'm assuming this will go in via arm-soc along with the rest of the series.
>>>
>>> The rest of the series, except for the clk patches I've already taken,
>>> doesn't seem to be going anywhere just yet. Is there a cpufreq or pm tree
>>> this can be merged through?
>>
>> You mean this particular patch or the whole series?
>>
>> If the former, then yes, there is.
>
> Just this patch. As I mentioned the rest of the series still needs some
> work, and likely won't make it in this cycle. If you could take this
> through the tree it would normally go through, avoiding any conflicts,
> that'd be great.

This patch has been obsoleted by Viresh's "cpufreq: dt-platdev:
Automatically create cpufreq device with OPP v2" patch.

ChenYu