linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the staging tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170817175743.GA5980@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:57:43 -0700
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        JB Van Puyvelde <jbvanpuyvelde@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the staging tree

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:02:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> After merging the staging tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> 
> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/imx/imx.c:1087:12: warning: 'imx_vcm_power_up' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static int imx_vcm_power_up(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>             ^
> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/imx/imx.c:1095:12: warning: 'imx_vcm_power_down' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static int imx_vcm_power_down(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>             ^
> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/imx/imx.c:1103:12: warning: 'imx_vcm_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static int imx_vcm_init(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>             ^
> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/imx/imx.c:1111:12: warning: 'imx_t_focus_vcm' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static int imx_t_focus_vcm(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u16 val)
>             ^
> 
> Introduced by commit
> 
>   9a5a6911aa3f ("staging: imx: fix non-static declarations")

Sorry for the delay, now dropped from my tree, I shouldn't have taken it
in the first place :(

greg k-h