linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict harder

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170817194858.znjttvqq662agwk2@ninjato>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:48:58 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc:     intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Benjamin Tissoires <btissoir@...hat.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict
 harder


> > > Signed-off-by: Lyude <lyude@...hat.com>
> > 
> > No full name? Or is it your full name?
> Looks like I forgot to change my desktop's S-B identity to full name,
> but it shouldn't be a big deal. I've got tons of other patches already
> upstream like this.

I'd much prefer a full name. But more importantly, what I definately
need is some review/ack/whatever because I don't know enough about this
stuff (other than knowing it is a fragile area).

Maybe you could resend with full name and the acpi list on CC?

Regards,

   Wolfram


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)