[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170818052613.GE3053@localhost>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:56:13 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Anup Patel <anup.patel@...adcom.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Device Tree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:54AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to fail here?
>
> Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available
> and skipping debugfs gracefully.
>
> If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir()
> should be reported.
reported yes, bailing out on that err no..
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists