[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170818.162922.1769160270805446057.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: colin.king@...onical.com
Cc: saeedm@...lanox.com, matanb@...lanox.com, leonro@...lanox.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx5: ensure 0 is returned when vport is zero
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:49:25 +0100
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Currently, if vport is zero then then an uninialized return status
> in err is returned. Since the only return status at the end of the
> function esw_add_uc_addr is zero for the current set of return paths
> we may as well just return 0 rather than err to fix this issue.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1452698 ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
>
> Fixes: eeb66cdb6826 ("net/mlx5: Separate between E-Switch and MPFS")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Applied to net-next, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists