linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative references

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170818082616.vyk5z5s2kicc66ip@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:26:16 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] kernel: tracepoints: add support for relative
 references


* Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:

> -static void for_each_tracepoint_range(struct tracepoint * const *begin,
> -		struct tracepoint * const *end,
> +static void for_each_tracepoint_range(const void *begin, const void *end,
>  		void (*fct)(struct tracepoint *tp, void *priv),
>  		void *priv)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PREL32_RELOCATIONS
> +	const signed int *iter;
> +
> +	if (!begin)
> +		return;
> +	for (iter = begin; iter < (signed int *)end; iter++) {
> +		fct((struct tracepoint *)((unsigned long)iter + *iter), priv);
> +	}

I think checkpatch is correct here to complain about the unnecessary curly braces 
here.

Plus why the heavy use of 'signed int' here and elsewhere in the patches - why 
not 'int' ?

Plus #2, the heavy use of type casts looks pretty ugly to begin with - is there no 
way to turn this into more natural code?

Thanks,

	Ingo