linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 05/12] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Report that effective affinity is a single target

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:39:18 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
        Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
        Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/12] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Report that effective affinity is a single target

The GICv3 ITS driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if
the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code
about this.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 68932873eebc..22e228500357 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ static int its_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
 		target_col = &its_dev->its->collections[cpu];
 		its_send_movi(its_dev, target_col, id);
 		its_dev->event_map.col_map[id] = cpu;
+		irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
 	}
 
 	return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
@@ -1481,6 +1482,7 @@ static int its_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
 
 		irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq + i,
 					      hwirq, &its_irq_chip, its_dev);
+		irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(virq + i)));
 		pr_debug("ID:%d pID:%d vID:%d\n",
 			 (int)(hwirq - its_dev->event_map.lpi_base),
 			 (int) hwirq, virq + i);
@@ -1495,13 +1497,16 @@ static void its_irq_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain,
 	struct its_device *its_dev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 	u32 event = its_get_event_id(d);
 	const struct cpumask *cpu_mask = cpu_online_mask;
+	int cpu;
 
 	/* get the cpu_mask of local node */
 	if (its_dev->its->numa_node >= 0)
 		cpu_mask = cpumask_of_node(its_dev->its->numa_node);
 
 	/* Bind the LPI to the first possible CPU */
-	its_dev->event_map.col_map[event] = cpumask_first(cpu_mask);
+	cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_mask);
+	its_dev->event_map.col_map[event] = cpu;
+	irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
 
 	/* Map the GIC IRQ and event to the device */
 	its_send_mapti(its_dev, d->hwirq, event);
-- 
2.11.0