linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola,cpcap-audio-codec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2017 12:47:30 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola,cpcap-audio-codec

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:53:59AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk> [170727 02:02]:

> > I don't follow you here. Why can't other parts of the chip use the
> > same supply? Regarding the other point: Handling the audio-codec

They can, they know they're part of the parent chip and should be
looking for the supply on the chip level.

> > differently than all other sub-modules of cpcap seems much more
> > problematic to me and the codec is basically the last one
> > missing:

> Mark, any comments on the above? I'm just wondering if the
> related dts changes are safe for me to pick.

No, they don't make sense.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)