[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <661ca6b5-bfb4-5377-d537-fb058d86ca0c@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:37:51 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
wanpeng.li@...mail.com, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: Avoid guest page table walk when
gpa_available is set
On 18/08/2017 14:36, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> + gpa = vcpu->arch.gpa_val;
>>> + ret = vcpu_is_mmio_gpa(vcpu, addr, gpa, write);
>>> + } else {
>>> + ret = vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa(vcpu, addr, &gpa, exception, write);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - ret = vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa(vcpu, addr, &gpa, exception, write);
>>> -
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> return X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT;
>> just wondering if it makes sense to move this into the else branch (as
>> it logically only belongs to vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa)
>
> It does, I took the liberty to change that.
It was on purpose, but it's okay either way. :)
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists