linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.2 59/59] packet: fix tp_reserve race in packet_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1503061993.333768724@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:13:13 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@...gle.com>,
        "Andrey Konovalov" <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 59/59] packet: fix tp_reserve race in packet_set_ring

3.2.92-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>

commit c27927e372f0785f3303e8fad94b85945e2c97b7 upstream.

Updates to tp_reserve can race with reads of the field in
packet_set_ring. Avoid this by holding the socket lock during
updates in setsockopt PACKET_RESERVE.

This bug was discovered by syzkaller.

Fixes: 8913336a7e8d ("packet: add PACKET_RESERVE sockopt")
Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 net/packet/af_packet.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -3132,14 +3132,19 @@ packet_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, i
 
 		if (optlen != sizeof(val))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		if (po->rx_ring.pg_vec || po->tx_ring.pg_vec)
-			return -EBUSY;
 		if (copy_from_user(&val, optval, sizeof(val)))
 			return -EFAULT;
 		if (val > INT_MAX)
 			return -EINVAL;
-		po->tp_reserve = val;
-		return 0;
+		lock_sock(sk);
+		if (po->rx_ring.pg_vec || po->tx_ring.pg_vec) {
+			ret = -EBUSY;
+		} else {
+			po->tp_reserve = val;
+			ret = 0;
+		}
+		release_sock(sk);
+		return ret;
 	}
 	case PACKET_LOSS:
 	{