[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1503062000.59300055@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:13:20 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Andrew Jones" <drjones@...hat.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"Christoffer Dall" <cdall@...aro.org>,
"Levente Kurusa" <lkurusa@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 066/134] KVM: arm/arm64: fix races in kvm_psci_vcpu_on
3.16.47-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
commit 6c7a5dce22b3f3cc44be098e2837fa6797edb8b8 upstream.
Fix potential races in kvm_psci_vcpu_on() by taking the kvm->lock
mutex. In general, it's a bad idea to allow more than one PSCI_CPU_ON
to process the same target VCPU at the same time. One such problem
that may arise is that one PSCI_CPU_ON could be resetting the target
vcpu, which fills the entire sys_regs array with a temporary value
including the MPIDR register, while another looks up the VCPU based
on the MPIDR value, resulting in no target VCPU found. Resolves both
races found with the kvm-unit-tests/arm/psci unit test.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Reported-by: Levente Kurusa <lkurusa@...hat.com>
Suggested-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
arch/arm/kvm/psci.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
@@ -191,9 +191,10 @@ int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vc
static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- int ret = 1;
+ struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
unsigned long psci_fn = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
unsigned long val;
+ int ret = 1;
switch (psci_fn) {
case PSCI_0_2_FN_PSCI_VERSION:
@@ -213,7 +214,9 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_
break;
case PSCI_0_2_FN_CPU_ON:
case PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_ON:
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
val = kvm_psci_vcpu_on(vcpu);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
break;
case PSCI_0_2_FN_AFFINITY_INFO:
case PSCI_0_2_FN64_AFFINITY_INFO:
@@ -269,6 +272,7 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_
static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
+ struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
unsigned long psci_fn = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
unsigned long val;
@@ -278,7 +282,9 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_
val = PSCI_RET_SUCCESS;
break;
case KVM_PSCI_FN_CPU_ON:
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
val = kvm_psci_vcpu_on(vcpu);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
break;
case KVM_PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND:
case KVM_PSCI_FN_MIGRATE:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists