[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a5d0743-d2db-89c8-59cc-542835baeccf@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:55:58 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Fix potentail deadlock between delete &
sysfs ops
On 08/17/2017 05:30 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 17:10:07 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
>
>> Instead of playing games with taking the lock, the only way this race
>> is hit, is if the partition is being deleted and the sysfs attribute is
>> being read at the same time, correct? In that case, just return
>> -ENODEV, and be done with it.
> Nevermind that wont work. Too bad there's not a mutex_lock_timeout()
> that we could use in a loop. It would solve the issue of forward
> progress with RT tasks, and will break after a timeout in case of
> deadlock.
>
> -- Steve
I think it will be useful to have mutex_timed_lock(). RT-mutex does have
a timed version, so I guess it shouldn't be hard to implement one for
mutex. I can take a shot at trying to do that.
Thanks,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists