[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5800ec1-3487-3c57-fcab-86d8e527552e@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:27:04 +0100
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx5: ensure 0 is returned when vport is zero
On 18/08/17 16:25, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Currently, if vport is zero then then an uninialized return status
> in err is returned. Since the only return status at the end of the
> function esw_add_uc_addr is zero for the current set of return paths
> we may as well just return 0 rather than err to fix this issue.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1452698 ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
>
> Fixes: eeb66cdb6826 ("net/mlx5: Separate between E-Switch and MPFS")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> index 6d9fb6ac6e9b..c77f4c0c7769 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static int esw_add_uc_addr(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, struct vport_addr *vaddr)
> esw_debug(esw->dev, "\tADDED UC MAC: vport[%d] %pM fr(%p)\n",
> vport, mac, vaddr->flow_rule);
>
> - return err;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int esw_del_uc_addr(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, struct vport_addr *vaddr)
>
Apologies, I accidentally re-sent this by mistake.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists