[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170818162830.GA115593@google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:28:31 -0700
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>, heiko@...ech.de,
boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, dianders@...omium.org,
mark.rutland@....com, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] pwm: rockchip: Remove the judge from return value
of pwm_config
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 05:32:55PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> I don't understand what the "judge" is supposed to be, but I've applied
> this to for-4.14/drivers anyway. Thanks.
Probably just an artifact of non-native English.
Judging by context, David probably meant more like "Remove the check for
the return value". I believe I've seen other non-native English speakers
use "judge" in a way similar to "check" or "test" in the context of
comparisons and error checking. (A search through my mailbox for "judge"
confirms this.)
Regards,
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists