lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170818162830.GA115593@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:28:31 -0700
From:   Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>, heiko@...ech.de,
        boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, dianders@...omium.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] pwm: rockchip: Remove the judge from return value
 of pwm_config

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 05:32:55PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> I don't understand what the "judge" is supposed to be, but I've applied
> this to for-4.14/drivers anyway. Thanks.

Probably just an artifact of non-native English.

Judging by context, David probably meant more like "Remove the check for
the return value". I believe I've seen other non-native English speakers
use "judge" in a way similar to "check" or "test" in the context of
comparisons and error checking. (A search through my mailbox for "judge"
confirms this.)

Regards,
Brian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ