[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170817.220343.905568389038615738.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 22:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: stephen@...workplumber.org
Cc: aviad.krawczyk@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bc.y@...wei.com, victor.gissin@...wei.com,
zhaochen6@...wei.com, tony.qu@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 net-next 01/21] net-next/hinic: Initialize hw
interface
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 17:42:05 -0700
> Please drop these functions, they do nothing and are not used
> as stubs in any operations table.
It might have been helpful to scan the entire series to understand
why it looks this way.
He's building the driver up, one piece at a time, filling in the full
implementation as is possible as more and more infrastructure is added.
So some functions start empty when a method is needed to be filled in,
and then gradually obtains more and more content throughout the
series.
And this is a fine way to add a huge new driver (although not my
personal preference).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists