linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: rockchip: Add support for pcie wake irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170818182850.GG6008@atomide.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:28:52 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dianders@...omium.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: rockchip: Add support for pcie wake irq

* jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com> [170818 11:05]:
> On 08/19/2017 01:01 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > BTW, in another context, Tony suggested we might need to fix up the IRQ flags
> > like this:
> > 
> > int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
> > {
> > ...
> >          err = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, handle_threaded_wake_irq,
> > -                                  IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), wirq);
> > +                                  IRQF_ONESHOT | irq_get_trigger_type(irq), dev_name(dev), wirq);
> > 
> > But IIUC, that's not actually necessary, because __setup_irq()
> > automatically configures the trigger type if the driver didn't request
> > one explicitly.
> 
> actually this would not work...irq_get_trigger_type would return zero due to
> a bug which we have a patch for it already:
> 
> 9908207 New          [tip:irq/urgent] genirq: Restore trigger settings in
> irq_modify_status()

Thanks for that information. So it seems we can leave out the
irq_get_trigger_type() here then? Might be worth checking
that it really does get populated though :)

> BTW, using dev_name for the name of this wake irq seems not very
> convenient...maybe add a ":wake" suffix?

Good idea, will take a look.

Regards,

Tony