| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170819172443.3hit5x766lqz3d6o@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 20:24:43 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: msuchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Ashley Lai <ashleydlai@...il.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tpmdd@...horst.ne
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: simplify crq initialization and
document crq format
Applied. I'll put this to 4.14 PR.
/Jarkko
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 08:18:59PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Ugh. I'll apply this. My apologies.
>
> /Jarkko
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:21:45AM +0200, msuchanek wrote:
> > ping?
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:35:16 +0100
> > Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > > The crq is passed in registers and is the same on BE and LE hosts.
> > > However, current implementation allocates a structure on-stack to
> > > represent the crq, initializes the members swapping them to BE, and
> > > loads the structure swapping it from BE. This is pointless and causes
> > > GCC warnings about ununitialized members. Get rid of the structure and
> > > the warnings.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2
> > >
> > > fix typos and spelling in comments
> > > ---
> > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 96
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 60
> > > insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> > > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c index 1b9d61ffe991..89027339d55f
> > > 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> > > @@ -39,19 +39,63 @@ static struct vio_device_id
> > > tpm_ibmvtpm_device_table[] = { MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(vio,
> > > tpm_ibmvtpm_device_table);
> > > /**
> > > + *
> > > + * ibmvtpm_send_crq_word - Send a CRQ request
> > > + * @vdev: vio device struct
> > > + * @w1: pre-constructed first word of tpm crq (second
> > > word is reserved)
> > > + *
> > > + * Return:
> > > + * 0 - Success
> > > + * Non-zero - Failure
> > > + */
> > > +static int ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(struct vio_dev *vdev, u64 w1)
> > > +{
> > > + return plpar_hcall_norets(H_SEND_CRQ, vdev->unit_address,
> > > w1, 0); +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + *
> > > * ibmvtpm_send_crq - Send a CRQ request
> > > *
> > > * @vdev: vio device struct
> > > - * @w1: first word
> > > - * @w2: second word
> > > + * @valid: Valid field
> > > + * @msg: Type field
> > > + * @len: Length field
> > > + * @data: Data field
> > > + *
> > > + * The ibmvtpm crq is defined as follows:
> > > + *
> > > + * Byte | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
> > > 7
> > > + *
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > + * Word0 | Valid | Type | Length | Data
> > > + *
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > + * Word1 | Reserved
> > > + *
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > + *
> > > + * Which matches the following structure (on bigendian host):
> > > + *
> > > + * struct ibmvtpm_crq {
> > > + * u8 valid;
> > > + * u8 msg;
> > > + * __be16 len;
> > > + * __be32 data;
> > > + * __be64 reserved;
> > > + * } __attribute__((packed, aligned(8)));
> > > + *
> > > + * However, the value is passed in a register so just compute the
> > > numeric value
> > > + * to load into the register avoiding byteswap altogether. Endian
> > > only affects
> > > + * memory loads and stores - registers are internally represented
> > > the same. *
> > > * Return:
> > > - * 0 -Sucess
> > > + * 0 (H_SUCCESS) - Success
> > > * Non-zero - Failure
> > > */
> > > -static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vio_dev *vdev, u64 w1, u64 w2)
> > > +static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vio_dev *vdev,
> > > + u8 valid, u8 msg, u16 len, u32 data)
> > > {
> > > - return plpar_hcall_norets(H_SEND_CRQ, vdev->unit_address,
> > > w1, w2);
> > > + u64 w1 = ((u64)valid << 56) | ((u64)msg << 48) | ((u64)len
> > > << 32) |
> > > + (u64)data;
> > > + return ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(vdev, w1);
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > @@ -109,8 +153,6 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_recv(struct tpm_chip
> > > *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct
> > > tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) {
> > > struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > > - struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> > > - __be64 *word = (__be64 *)&crq;
> > > int rc, sig;
> > >
> > > if (!ibmvtpm->rtce_buf) {
> > > @@ -137,10 +179,6 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip
> > > *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) spin_lock(&ibmvtpm->rtce_lock);
> > > ibmvtpm->res_len = 0;
> > > memcpy((void *)ibmvtpm->rtce_buf, (void *)buf, count);
> > > - crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> > > - crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_TPM_COMMAND;
> > > - crq.len = cpu_to_be16(count);
> > > - crq.data = cpu_to_be32(ibmvtpm->rtce_dma_handle);
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * set the processing flag before the Hcall, since we may
> > > get the @@ -148,8 +186,9 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct
> > > tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) */
> > > ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd = true;
> > >
> > > - rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, be64_to_cpu(word[0]),
> > > - be64_to_cpu(word[1]));
> > > + rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> > > + IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_TPM_COMMAND,
> > > + count, ibmvtpm->rtce_dma_handle);
> > > if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
> > > dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_send failed
> > > rc=%d\n", rc); rc = 0;
> > > @@ -182,15 +221,10 @@ static u8 tpm_ibmvtpm_status(struct tpm_chip
> > > *chip) */
> > > static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
> > > {
> > > - struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> > > - u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
> > > int rc;
> > >
> > > - crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> > > - crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_GET_RTCE_BUFFER_SIZE;
> > > -
> > > - rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
> > > - cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> > > + rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> > > + IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD,
> > > VTPM_GET_RTCE_BUFFER_SIZE, 0, 0); if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> > > dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> > > "ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size failed rc=%d\n",
> > > rc); @@ -210,15 +244,10 @@ static int
> > > ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm) */
> > > static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_version(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
> > > {
> > > - struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> > > - u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
> > > int rc;
> > >
> > > - crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> > > - crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_GET_VERSION;
> > > -
> > > - rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
> > > - cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> > > + rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> > > + IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_GET_VERSION, 0, 0);
> > > if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> > > dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> > > "ibmvtpm_crq_get_version failed rc=%d\n",
> > > rc); @@ -238,7 +267,7 @@ static int
> > > ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm) {
> > > int rc;
> > >
> > > - rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD, 0);
> > > + rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD);
> > > if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> > > dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> > > "ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete failed
> > > rc=%d\n", rc); @@ -258,7 +287,7 @@ static int
> > > ibmvtpm_crq_send_init(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm) {
> > > int rc;
> > >
> > > - rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD, 0);
> > > + rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD);
> > > if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> > > dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> > > "ibmvtpm_crq_send_init failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> > > @@ -336,15 +365,10 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend(struct device
> > > *dev) {
> > > struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > > - struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> > > - u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
> > > int rc = 0;
> > >
> > > - crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> > > - crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND;
> > > -
> > > - rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
> > > - cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> > > + rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> > > + IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND,
> > > 0, 0); if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> > > dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> > > "tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists