linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3] arm: eBPF JIT compiler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9d77730f-c6a8-b337-599e-5919207a7e0a@fb.com>
Date:   Sat, 19 Aug 2017 13:48:43 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To:     Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>
CC:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] arm: eBPF JIT compiler

On 8/19/17 12:59 PM, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> not be able to compare them like kees this week.
> Does that sound good?

yeah. that's fine. I was more interested in selftests/.../test_progs
numbers before/after, since they're more representative of real world
performance vs test_bpf.ko

> Thats right. But still an improvement I guess. I think I discussed it
> with Daniel and I thought, I should get this patch reach mainstream
> first then I can improve on it.

agree. To me the patch looks ready to land.