[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170820065757.GA6081@Red>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 08:57:57 +0200
From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] net: stmmac: register parent MDIO node for
sun8i-h3-emac
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 10:38:36PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 08:50:25PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 01:05:21AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Corentin Labbe
> > > <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > In case of a MDIO switch, the registered MDIO node should be
> > > > the parent of the PHY. Otherwise of_phy_connect will fail.
>
> Hi Corentin
>
> Sorry, I missed this patch series. Looking at patchwork...
That's my fault, I forgot to set you in recipient like in last send.
>
> Can you represent the MDIO mux using
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mdio-mux-mmioreg.txt
>
> It would be better if you could reuse existing infrastructure than
> invent something new.
>
I think we cannot use mdio-mux-mmioreg since the register for doing the switch is in middle of the "System Control" and shared with other functions.
This is why we use a sycon/regmap for selecting the MDIO.
Regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists