lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170821202338.GD28977@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:23:38 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] PCI: Factor out pci_bus_wait_crs()

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:37:06PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 8/21/2017 3:18 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> ...
> if (pci_bus_crs_pending(id))
> 	return pci_bus_wait_crs(dev->bus, dev->devfn, &id, 60000);
> 
> > I think that makes sense.  We'd want to check for CRS SV being
> > enabled, e.g., maybe read PCI_EXP_RTCTL_CRSSVE back in
> > pci_enable_crs() and cache it somewhere.  Maybe a crs_sv_enabled bit
> > in the root port's pci_dev, and check it with something like what
> > pcie_root_rcb_set() does?
> > 
> 
> You can observe CRS under the following conditions
> 
> 1. root port <-> endpoint 
> 2. bridge <-> endpoint 
> 3. root port<->bridge
> 
> I was relying on the fact that we are reading 0x001 as an indication that
> this device detected CRS. Maybe, this is too indirect.
> 
> If we also want to capture the capability, I think the right thing is to
> check the parent capability.
> 
> bool pci_bus_crs_vis_supported(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> {
> 	if (device type(bridge) == root port)
> 		return read(root_crs_register_reg);
> 
> 	if (device type(bridge) == switch)
> 		return read(switch_crs_register);

I don't understand this part.  AFAIK, CRS SV is only a feature of root
ports.  The capability and enable bits are in the Root Capabilities
and Root Control registers.

It's certainly true that a device below a switch can respond with a
CRS completion, but the switch is not the requester, and my
understanding is that it would not take any action on the completion
other than passing it upstream.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ