[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12e90c78-d8dc-5184-17aa-281cd0ad5417@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:25:07 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, edubezval@...il.com,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal/drivers/hisi: Remove confusing error message
On 22/08/2017 10:04, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Hi Leo,
>>
>> a cleanest solution would be either:
>>
>> - add the 3 missing thermal sensors in the DT and default to the id 2
>
> Yeah, so do you think below change works for you?
Isn't it possible to set the delay also ? so we don't have to send
another patch if we want to use one of those instead of 2.
> ---8<---
>
> ARM64: dts: hisilicon: add missed thermal sensors for Hi6220
>
> The thermal driver tries to register four sensors but the DT only binds
> one sensor (sensor ID 2) with thermal zone, as result the thermal driver
> reports failure for missed thermal sensor binding.
>
> This patch adds missed thermal sensor for Hi6220, so can dismiss the
> booting failure log.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
> index eacbe0d..44c2bc7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
> @@ -833,6 +833,18 @@
>
> thermal-zones {
>
> + local: local {
> + polling-delay = <0>;
> + polling-delay-passive = <0>;
> + thermal-sensors = <&tsensor 0>;
> + };
> +
> + cls1: cls1 {
> + polling-delay = <0>;
> + polling-delay-passive = <0>;
> + thermal-sensors = <&tsensor 1>;
> + };
> +
> cls0: cls0 {
> polling-delay = <1000>;
> polling-delay-passive = <100>;
> @@ -862,6 +874,12 @@
> };
> };
> };
> +
> + gpu: gpu {
> + polling-delay = <0>;
> + polling-delay-passive = <0>;
> + thermal-sensors = <&tsensor 3>;
> + };
> };
>
>
>> or
>>
>> - remove all the code assuming 4 sensors and deal with the one unique
>> sensor
>
> I personally prefer to avoid doing this, if only register one unique
> sensor this will let us have no flexiblity for trying multiple sensors
> on this platform.
Ok, I will on the other side give a cleanup in the driver to optimize
the sensors lookup.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists