linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Fix use of NULL with find_idlest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87d17n3mvr.fsf@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:41:44 +0100
From:   Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@....com>
To:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Andres Oportus <andresoportus@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Fix use of NULL with find_idlest_group


On Tue, Aug 22 2017 at 07:48, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 21 August 2017 at 17:21, Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@....com> wrote:
>> The current use of returning NULL from find_idlest_group is broken in
> [snip]
>> ---
>>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index 64618d768546..7cb5ed719cf9 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -5382,26 +5382,29 @@ static unsigned long capacity_spare_wake(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>>   * domain.
>>   */
>>  static struct sched_group *
>> -find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
>> -                 int this_cpu, int sd_flag)
>> +find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag)
>>  {
>>         struct sched_group *idlest = NULL, *group = sd->groups;
>> +       struct sched_group *local_group = sd->groups;
>>         struct sched_group *most_spare_sg = NULL;
>> -       unsigned long min_runnable_load = ULONG_MAX, this_runnable_load = 0;
>> -       unsigned long min_avg_load = ULONG_MAX, this_avg_load = 0;
>> +       unsigned long min_runnable_load = ULONG_MAX, this_runnable_load = ULONG_MAX;
>> +       unsigned long min_avg_load = ULONG_MAX, this_avg_load = ULONG_MAX;
>
> Good catch for this_runnable_load, indeed there is a problem is
> local_group is not allowed
>
>>         unsigned long most_spare = 0, this_spare = 0; >>         int load_idx = sd->forkexec_idx;
>>         int imbalance_scale = 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct-100)/2;
>>         unsigned long imbalance = scale_load_down(NICE_0_LOAD) *
>>                                 (sd->imbalance_pct-100) / 100;
>>
>> +       if (!cpumask_intersects(sched_domain_span(sd), &p->cpus_allowed))
>> +               return NULL;
>
> You should put that test above at upper level in the while (sd) loop
> or even before the while(sd) loop as there is even no need to start
> this while loop in this case. There is no need to call
> find_idlest_group if there is no cpu allowed and no group to find.
> Then, you can keep the current behavior of find_idlest_group() which
> return null if there no best group than the local one

True. I have to admit the reason I didn't do this is because due to the
current "else while", doing this outside the loop would have meant
another level of indentation. But actually if I break out a new function
as in Peter's proposal I can avoid that (plus I probably shouldn't let
code beauty overrule warm-path performance :| ).

>> +
>>         if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE)
>>                 load_idx = sd->wake_idx;
>>
>>         do {
>>                 unsigned long load, avg_load, runnable_load;
>>                 unsigned long spare_cap, max_spare_cap;
>> -               int local_group;
>> +               bool group_is_local = group == local_group;
>>                 int i;
>>
>>                 /* Skip over this group if it has no CPUs allowed */
>
> [snip]
>
>> @@ -5927,8 +5927,12 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
>>                         continue;
>>                 }
>>
>> -               group = find_idlest_group(sd, p, cpu, sd_flag);
>> +               group = find_idlest_group(sd, p, sd_flag);
>>                 if (!group) {
>> +                       break;
>> +               } else if (group == sd->groups) {
>> +                       new_cpu = cpu;
>
> The " new_cpu = cpu" above should be put before the while(sd) loop
> like in Peter's proposal

I don't think that would work - I've responded along with Joel in the
other subthread.

>> +                       /* Now try balancing at a lower domain level of cpu */
>>                         sd = sd->child;
>>                         continue;
>>                 }
>> --
>> 2.14.1
>>