| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1595884.XH9dSsijkg@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 14:55:39 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] PM / Hibernate: Feed the wathdog when creating snapshot
On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 5:20:02 AM CEST Chen Yu wrote:
> There is a problem that when counting the pages for creating
> the hibernation snapshot will take significant amount of
> time, especially on system with large memory. Since the counting
> job is performed with irq disabled, this might lead to NMI lockup.
> The following warning were found on a system with 1.5TB DRAM:
>
> [ 1124.758184] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.002 seconds) done.
> [ 1124.768721] OOM killer disabled.
> [ 1124.847009] PM: Preallocating image memory...
> [ 1139.392042] NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 27
> [ 1139.392076] CPU: 27 PID: 3128 Comm: systemd-sleep Not tainted 4.13.0-0.rc2.git0.1.fc27.x86_64 #1
> [ 1139.392077] task: ffff9f01971ac000 task.stack: ffffb1a3f325c000
> [ 1139.392083] RIP: 0010:memory_bm_find_bit+0xf4/0x100
> [ 1139.392084] RSP: 0018:ffffb1a3f325fc20 EFLAGS: 00000006
> [ 1139.392084] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000013b83000 RCX: ffff9fbe89caf000
> [ 1139.392085] RDX: ffffb1a3f325fc30 RSI: 0000000000003200 RDI: ffff9fbeaffffe80
> [ 1139.392085] RBP: ffffb1a3f325fc40 R08: 0000000013b80000 R09: ffff9fbe89c54878
> [ 1139.392085] R10: ffffb1a3f325fc2c R11: 0000000013b83200 R12: 0000000000000400
> [ 1139.392086] R13: fffffd552e0c0000 R14: ffff9fc1bffd31e0 R15: 0000000000000202
> [ 1139.392086] FS: 00007f3189704180(0000) GS:ffff9fbec8ec0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 1139.392087] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 1139.392087] CR2: 00000085da0f7398 CR3: 000001771cf9a000 CR4: 00000000007406e0
> [ 1139.392088] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [ 1139.392088] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [ 1139.392088] PKRU: 55555554
> [ 1139.392089] Call Trace:
> [ 1139.392092] ? memory_bm_set_bit+0x29/0x60
> [ 1139.392094] swsusp_set_page_free+0x2b/0x30
> [ 1139.392098] mark_free_pages+0x147/0x1c0
> [ 1139.392099] count_data_pages+0x41/0xa0
> [ 1139.392101] hibernate_preallocate_memory+0x80/0x450
> [ 1139.392102] hibernation_snapshot+0x58/0x410
> [ 1139.392103] hibernate+0x17c/0x310
> [ 1139.392104] state_store+0xdf/0xf0
> [ 1139.392107] kobj_attr_store+0xf/0x20
> [ 1139.392111] sysfs_kf_write+0x37/0x40
> [ 1139.392113] kernfs_fop_write+0x11c/0x1a0
> [ 1139.392117] __vfs_write+0x37/0x170
> [ 1139.392121] ? handle_mm_fault+0xd8/0x230
> [ 1139.392122] vfs_write+0xb1/0x1a0
> [ 1139.392123] SyS_write+0x55/0xc0
> [ 1139.392126] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa5
> ...
> [ 1144.690405] done (allocated 6590003 pages)
> [ 1144.694971] PM: Allocated 26360012 kbytes in 19.89 seconds (1325.28 MB/s)
>
> It has taken nearly 20 seconds(2.10GHz CPU) thus the NMI lockup
> was triggered. In case the timeout of the NMI watch dog has been
> set to 1 second, a safe interval should be 6590003/20 = 320k pages
> in theory. However there might also be some platforms running at a
> lower frequency, so feed the watchdog every 128k pages(per Andrew's
> suggestion, this should avoid the modulus operation).
>
> Reported-by: Jan Filipcewicz <jan.filipcewicz@...el.com>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> ---
> v2: Use an interval of 128k instead of 100k to
> avoid the modulus operation.
> --
> mm/page_alloc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 1bad301..3cf4201 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> +#include <linux/nmi.h>
>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> @@ -2535,9 +2536,15 @@ void drain_all_pages(struct zone *zone)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
>
> +/*
> + * Touch the watchdog for every WD_INTERVAL_PAGE pages,
> + * choose a power of 2 to avoid the modulus operation.
> + */
> +#define WD_INTERVAL_PAGE (128*1024)
Sort of on a second thought I would define
#define WD_PAGE_COUNT (128*1024)
and then ->
> +
> void mark_free_pages(struct zone *zone)
> {
> - unsigned long pfn, max_zone_pfn;
> + unsigned long pfn, max_zone_pfn, page_num = 0;
+ unsigned long pfn, max_zone_pfn, page_count = WD_PAGE_COUNT;
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned int order, t;
> struct page *page;
> @@ -2552,6 +2559,9 @@ void mark_free_pages(struct zone *zone)
> if (pfn_valid(pfn)) {
> page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>
> + if (!((page_num++) % WD_INTERVAL_PAGE))
> + touch_nmi_watchdog();
> +
->
if (!--page_count) {
touch_nmi_watchdog();
page_count = WD_PAGE_COUNT;
}
> if (page_zone(page) != zone)
> continue;
>
> @@ -2565,8 +2575,11 @@ void mark_free_pages(struct zone *zone)
> unsigned long i;
>
> pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> - for (i = 0; i < (1UL << order); i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < (1UL << order); i++) {
> + if (!((page_num++) % WD_INTERVAL_PAGE))
> + touch_nmi_watchdog();
And analogously here.
> swsusp_set_page_free(pfn_to_page(pfn + i));
> + }
> }
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
>
And you may want to touch the watchdog at the end too in case
page_count is small then.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists