[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170822142322.GD30286@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 16:23:22 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v7] printk: Add monotonic, boottime, and realtime
timestamps
On Tue 2017-08-22 10:09:40, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>
> On 08/17/2017 11:30 AM, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> > On 08/17/2017 06:15 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> >> printk.time=1/CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=1 adds a unmodified local hardware clock
> >> timestamp to printk messages. The local hardware clock loses time each
> >> day making it difficult to determine exactly when an issue has occurred in
> >> the kernel log, and making it difficult to determine how kernel and
> >> hardware issues relate to each other in real time.
> > Congrats, greatly eases merges into older kernels, and has eliminated the churn
> > this could place on all the configured systems out there.
> >
> > Sadly, one of my suggestions did not quite go the way I expected ;-} easy to
> > correct, and fix (I missed a spot in my original suggestion, as code changed
> > underfoot over the set ;-/). (see bottom)
>
> Added. I will send out v8 shortly.
It might make sense to wait a bit. I am in the middle of v7 review and
have several comments.
I would suggest to slow down this a bit anyway. You sent 7 versions
within three weeks. It improved nicely over time. But I think that
I am not the only one who has troubles to follow.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists