[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170822191328.148215175@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:13:58 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 26/27] usb: optimize acpi companion search for usb port devices
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
commit ed18c5fa945768a9bec994e786edbbbc7695acf6 upstream.
This optimization significantly reduces xhci driver load time.
In ACPI tables the acpi companion port devices are children of
the hub device. The port devices are identified by their port number
returned by the ACPI _ADR method.
_ADR 0 is reserved for the root hub device.
The current implementation to find a acpi companion port device
loops through all acpi port devices under that parent hub, evaluating
their _ADR method each time a new port device is added.
for a xHC controller with 25 ports under its roothub it
will end up invoking ACPI bytecode 625 times before all ports
are ready, making it really slow.
The _ADR values are already read and cached earler. So instead of
running the bytecode again we can check the cached _ADR value first,
and then fall back to the old way.
As one of the more significant changes, the xhci load time on
Intel kabylake reduced by 70%, (28ms) from
initcall xhci_pci_init+0x0/0x49 returned 0 after 39537 usecs
to
initcall xhci_pci_init+0x0/0x49 returned 0 after 11270 usecs
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c
@@ -127,6 +127,22 @@ out:
*/
#define USB_ACPI_LOCATION_VALID (1 << 31)
+static struct acpi_device *usb_acpi_find_port(struct acpi_device *parent,
+ int raw)
+{
+ struct acpi_device *adev;
+
+ if (!parent)
+ return NULL;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(adev, &parent->children, node) {
+ if (acpi_device_adr(adev) == raw)
+ return adev;
+ }
+
+ return acpi_find_child_device(parent, raw, false);
+}
+
static struct acpi_device *usb_acpi_find_companion(struct device *dev)
{
struct usb_device *udev;
@@ -174,8 +190,10 @@ static struct acpi_device *usb_acpi_find
int raw;
raw = usb_hcd_find_raw_port_number(hcd, port1);
- adev = acpi_find_child_device(ACPI_COMPANION(&udev->dev),
- raw, false);
+
+ adev = usb_acpi_find_port(ACPI_COMPANION(&udev->dev),
+ raw);
+
if (!adev)
return NULL;
} else {
@@ -186,7 +204,9 @@ static struct acpi_device *usb_acpi_find
return NULL;
acpi_bus_get_device(parent_handle, &adev);
- adev = acpi_find_child_device(adev, port1, false);
+
+ adev = usb_acpi_find_port(adev, port1);
+
if (!adev)
return NULL;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists