[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0df9cbd4-30d8-2a30-07ee-bd0b38bd606b@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:46:39 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: phy: Don't use drv when it is NULL in
phy_attached_print
On 08/21/2017 07:24 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 01:45:30PM +0200, Romain Perier wrote:
>> Currently, if this logging function is used prior the phy driver is
>> bound to the phy device (that is usually done from .ndo_open),
>> 'phydev->drv' might be NULL, resulting in a kernel crash. That is
>> typically the case in the stmmac driver, info about the phy is displayed
>> during the registration of the MDIO bus, and then genphy driver is bound
>> to this phydev when .ndo_open is called.
>>
>> This commit fixes the issue by using the right genphy driver, when
>> phydev->drv is NULL.
>>
>> Fixes: fbca164776e4 ("net: stmmac: Use the right logging functi")
>> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> index 1790f7fec125..6af6dc6dfeaf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> @@ -864,15 +864,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(phy_attached_info);
>> #define ATTACHED_FMT "attached PHY driver [%s] (mii_bus:phy_addr=%s, irq=%d)"
>> void phy_attached_print(struct phy_device *phydev, const char *fmt, ...)
>> {
>> + struct phy_driver *drv = phydev->drv;
>> +
>> + if (!drv) {
>> + if (phydev->is_c45)
>> + drv = &genphy_10g_driver;
>> + else
>> + drv = &genphy_driver;
>> + }
>> +
>
> As i said in my comment to v1, i don't like this.
Agreed, just use Andrew's earlier suggestion of checking phydev->drv
validity.
We don't have an equivalent of "unregistered" in the PHY layer, but
"unbound" seems like it could be what we want here.
Thanks
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists