linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.12 28/41] perf/x86: Fix RDPMC vs. mm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170822190943.067313854@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:13:56 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.12 28/41] perf/x86: Fix RDPMC vs. mm_struct tracking

4.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

commit bfe334924ccd9f4a53f30240c03cf2f43f5b2df1 upstream.

Vince reported the following rdpmc() testcase failure:

 > Failing test case:
 >
 >	fd=perf_event_open();
 >	addr=mmap(fd);
 >	exec()  // without closing or unmapping the event
 >	fd=perf_event_open();
 >	addr=mmap(fd);
 >	rdpmc()	// GPFs due to rdpmc being disabled

The problem is of course that exec() plays tricks with what is
current->mm, only destroying the old mappings after having
installed the new mm.

Fix this confusion by passing along vma->vm_mm instead of relying on
current->mm.

Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Tested-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Fixes: 1e0fb9ec679c ("perf: Add pmu callbacks to track event mapping and unmapping")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170802173930.cstykcqefmqt7jau@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
[ Minor cleanups. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/events/core.c     |   16 +++++++---------
 include/linux/perf_event.h |    4 ++--
 kernel/events/core.c       |    6 +++---
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2105,7 +2105,7 @@ static void refresh_pce(void *ignored)
 		load_mm_cr4(current->active_mm);
 }
 
-static void x86_pmu_event_mapped(struct perf_event *event)
+static void x86_pmu_event_mapped(struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	if (!(event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_RDPMC_ALLOWED))
 		return;
@@ -2120,22 +2120,20 @@ static void x86_pmu_event_mapped(struct
 	 * For now, this can't happen because all callers hold mmap_sem
 	 * for write.  If this changes, we'll need a different solution.
 	 */
-	lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+	lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&mm->mmap_sem);
 
-	if (atomic_inc_return(&current->mm->context.perf_rdpmc_allowed) == 1)
-		on_each_cpu_mask(mm_cpumask(current->mm), refresh_pce, NULL, 1);
+	if (atomic_inc_return(&mm->context.perf_rdpmc_allowed) == 1)
+		on_each_cpu_mask(mm_cpumask(mm), refresh_pce, NULL, 1);
 }
 
-static void x86_pmu_event_unmapped(struct perf_event *event)
+static void x86_pmu_event_unmapped(struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-	if (!current->mm)
-		return;
 
 	if (!(event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_RDPMC_ALLOWED))
 		return;
 
-	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&current->mm->context.perf_rdpmc_allowed))
-		on_each_cpu_mask(mm_cpumask(current->mm), refresh_pce, NULL, 1);
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mm->context.perf_rdpmc_allowed))
+		on_each_cpu_mask(mm_cpumask(mm), refresh_pce, NULL, 1);
 }
 
 static int x86_pmu_event_idx(struct perf_event *event)
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -310,8 +310,8 @@ struct pmu {
 	 * Notification that the event was mapped or unmapped.  Called
 	 * in the context of the mapping task.
 	 */
-	void (*event_mapped)		(struct perf_event *event); /*optional*/
-	void (*event_unmapped)		(struct perf_event *event); /*optional*/
+	void (*event_mapped)		(struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm); /* optional */
+	void (*event_unmapped)		(struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm); /* optional */
 
 	/*
 	 * Flags for ->add()/->del()/ ->start()/->stop(). There are
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -5084,7 +5084,7 @@ static void perf_mmap_open(struct vm_are
 		atomic_inc(&event->rb->aux_mmap_count);
 
 	if (event->pmu->event_mapped)
-		event->pmu->event_mapped(event);
+		event->pmu->event_mapped(event, vma->vm_mm);
 }
 
 static void perf_pmu_output_stop(struct perf_event *event);
@@ -5107,7 +5107,7 @@ static void perf_mmap_close(struct vm_ar
 	unsigned long size = perf_data_size(rb);
 
 	if (event->pmu->event_unmapped)
-		event->pmu->event_unmapped(event);
+		event->pmu->event_unmapped(event, vma->vm_mm);
 
 	/*
 	 * rb->aux_mmap_count will always drop before rb->mmap_count and
@@ -5405,7 +5405,7 @@ aux_unlock:
 	vma->vm_ops = &perf_mmap_vmops;
 
 	if (event->pmu->event_mapped)
-		event->pmu->event_mapped(event);
+		event->pmu->event_mapped(event, vma->vm_mm);
 
 	return ret;
 }