[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170822204743.GR32112@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 22:47:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Dmitri Prokhorov <Dmitry.Prohorov@...el.com>,
Valery Cherepennikov <valery.cherepennikov@...el.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3]: perf/core: use context tstamp_data for skipped
events on mux interrupt
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:57:43PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> The key thing in the patch is explicit updating of tstamp fields for
> INACTIVE events in update_event_times().
> @@ -1405,6 +1426,9 @@ static void update_event_times(struct perf_event *event)
> event->group_leader->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
> return;
>
> + if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
> + perf_event_tstamp_update(event);
> +
> /*
> * in cgroup mode, time_enabled represents
> * the time the event was enabled AND active
But why!? I thought the whole point was to not need to do this.
The thing I outlined earlier would only need to update timestamps when
events change state and at no other point in time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists