linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Drop few entries from whitelist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2017 12:33:31 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>, baoyou.xie@...aro.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Drop few entries from whitelist

Hi Viresh,


2017-08-16 14:37 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>:
> Drop few ARM (32 and 64 bit) platforms from the whitelist which always
> use "operating-points-v2" property from their DT. They should continue
> to work after this patch.
>
> Tested on Hikey platform (only the "hisilicon,hi6220" entry).
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 11 -----------
>  1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> index 061b468512a2..45f2ec3b7f7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id whitelist[] __initconst = {
>         { .compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31s", },
>         { .compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20", },
>         { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23", },
> -       { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33", },
>         { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t", },
>         { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3", },
>
> @@ -37,7 +36,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id whitelist[] __initconst = {
>         { .compatible = "arm,integrator-cp", },
>
>         { .compatible = "hisilicon,hi3660", },
> -       { .compatible = "hisilicon,hi6220", },
>
>         { .compatible = "fsl,imx27", },
>         { .compatible = "fsl,imx51", },
> @@ -51,11 +49,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id whitelist[] __initconst = {
>         { .compatible = "samsung,exynos3250", },
>         { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210", },
>         { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212", },
> -       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4412", },
>         { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250", },
>  #ifndef CONFIG_BL_SWITCHER
> -       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420", },
> -       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5433", },
>         { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5800", },
>  #endif
>
> @@ -87,11 +82,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id whitelist[] __initconst = {
>         { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3368", },
>         { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399", },
>
> -       { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-pro5", },
> -       { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-pxs2", },
>         { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-ld6b", },
> -       { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-ld11", },
> -       { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-ld20", },


Please remove "socionext,uniphier-ld6b" as well.

It includes the same silicon die
of "socionext,uniphier-pxs2".



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada