linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] storvsc: do not assume SG list is continuous when doing bounce buffers (for 4.1 stable only)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170823134100.GC31113@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2017 06:41:00 -0700
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>, KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
        "devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] storvsc: do not assume SG list is continuous when doing
 bounce buffers (for 4.1 stable only)

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:43:19PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Ok.  If the stable maintainers are ok with your small fix
> I'm not going to complain too loudly.  But I'm always worried about
> stable trees divering too much from mainline.

Given that 90% of the time we do this, something breaks, you have a
right to be worried...