linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] SCSI fixes for 4.13-rc6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1vale9ueb.fsf@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:27:24 -0400
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Cc:     "torvalds\@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "James.Bottomley\@HansenPartnership.com" 
        <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        "akpm\@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SCSI fixes for 4.13-rc6


Hi Bart,

> Had you noticed that Damien had asked not to send the "sd_zbc: Write
> unlock zone from sd_uninit_cmnd()" patch to Linus without my "scsi-mq:
> Always unprepare before requeuing a request" patch?

He did change his mind later in that thread, though.

However, what's more important is that we still need a good version of
your patch for 4.13. I took Brian's workaround for ipr but I still think
Christoph's concerns need to be addressed for me to put your change back
in.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering