linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] binder: let ANDROID_BINDER_IPC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:51:08 -0700
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Cc:     arve@...roid.com, riandrews@...roid.com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binder: let ANDROID_BINDER_IPC_32BIT be selectable on
 32bit ARM

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 07:03:05PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> As noted in commit d0bdff0db809 ("staging: Fix build issues with new
> binder API"), we can add back the choice for 32bit ARM "once a 64bit
> __get_user_asm_* implementation is merged." Commit e38361d032f1 ("ARM:
> 8091/2: add get_user() support for 8 byte types") has added the
> support, so it's time to let ANDROID_BINDER_IPC_32BIT be selectable on
> 32bit ARM

Ok, but:

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
> ---
>  drivers/android/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/android/Kconfig b/drivers/android/Kconfig
> index 832e885349b1..aca5dc30b97b 100644
> --- a/drivers/android/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/android/Kconfig
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ config ANDROID_BINDER_DEVICES
>  	  therefore logically separated from the other devices.
>  
>  config ANDROID_BINDER_IPC_32BIT
> -	bool
> +	bool "Use old (Android 4.4 and earlier) 32-bit binder API"
>  	depends on !64BIT && ANDROID_BINDER_IPC

You don't actually change the depends line :(

Please fix up, and test it, and then resend.

thanks,

greg k-h