linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Arm: mm: ftrace: Only set text back to ro after kernel has been marked ro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:48:13 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
        Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.org>,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Matthias Reichl <hias@...us.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Arm: mm: ftrace: Only set text back to ro after kernel
 has been marked ro

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> ftrace needs to modify the kernel text in order to enable function tracing.
> For security reasons, the kernel text is marked to read-only (ro) at the end
> of system bootup. When enabling function tracing after that, ftrace calls
> arch specific code that needs to enable the modification of kernel text
> while ftrace does the update, and reset it back again when finished.
>
> The issue arises when function tracing is enabled during system bootup. The
> text hasn't been marked as read-only yet, but the same code to modify the
> kernel is executed, and when it is finished, it will cause the kernel to
> become read-only. This causes issues for other init code that requires
> modification of kernel text during system bootup. This appears to cause
> issue with Raspberry Pi 2.
>
> By implementing the feature that is used in x86 to deal with this issue, it
> fixes the problem. The solution is simple. Have a variable
> (kernel_set_to_readonly) get set when the system finished boot and marks the
> kernel to readonly. If that variable is not set, both
> kernel_set_to_readonly() and kernel_set_to_rw() return without doing any
> modifications. Those functions are used by ftrace to change the permissions
> of the kernel text. By not doing anything, ftrace will not mess with the
> permissions when it is enabled at system bootup.
>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170821153402.7so2u364htvt6tnf@camel2.lan
> Link: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/2166#issuecomment-323355145
> Reported-by: Matthias Reichl <hias@...us.com>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
> Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
> Cc: Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.org>
> Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: 80d6b0c2ee ("ARM: mm: allow text and rodata sections to be read-only")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/init.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> index ad80548..fd75f38 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> @@ -745,19 +745,29 @@ static int __mark_rodata_ro(void *unused)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static int kernel_set_to_readonly;

Adding a comment here might be a good idea, something like:

/* Has system boot-up reached mark_rodata_ro() yet? */

Otherwise:

Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

> +
>  void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>  {
> +       kernel_set_to_readonly = 1;
> +
>         stop_machine(__mark_rodata_ro, NULL, NULL);
>  }
>
>  void set_kernel_text_rw(void)
>  {
> +       if (!kernel_set_to_readonly)
> +               return;
> +
>         set_section_perms(ro_perms, ARRAY_SIZE(ro_perms), false,
>                                 current->active_mm);
>  }
>
>  void set_kernel_text_ro(void)
>  {
> +       if (!kernel_set_to_readonly)
> +               return;
> +
>         set_section_perms(ro_perms, ARRAY_SIZE(ro_perms), true,
>                                 current->active_mm);
>  }

Does arm64 suffer from a similar condition? (It looks like no, as text
patching is done with a fixmap poke.)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security