[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0ztyGg6Lt8pWk530zFjhTFP3EAQpmswESkjk=HPZTwKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:02:39 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: avoid false-positive gcc-8 warning
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> This is an interesting regression with gcc-8, showing a harmless
> warning for correct code:
>
> In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
> ...
> from drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:23:
> include/linux/printk.h:301:2: error: 'eq' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> ^~~~~~
> In file included from drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:58:0:
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h:451:31: note: 'eq' was declared here
>
> I tried to come up with a reduced test case for gcc here
> a few times, but every time ended up with code that is actually
> wrong with older gcc versions missing the bug and gcc-8 finding
> it. As this is the only false-positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized
> warnign I got with gcc-8 randconfig builds, I'd suggest we
> work around it.
>
> Making the index variable 'unsigned' is enough to shut up
> the warning, as gcc can then see that comparing eqidx to
> phba->io_channel_irqs is fine here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Sorry, I have to retract my patch. While it apparently solved the problem
for most randconfig builds, I have now run into another case that it did
not address, and I still get the warning for one caller:
In file included from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
from /git/arm-soc/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:44,
from /git/arm-soc/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:5,
from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/sched.h:11,
from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/blkdev.h:4,
from /git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:23:
/git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c: In function
'lpfc_debug_dump_all_queues':
/git/arm-soc/include/linux/printk.h:301:2: error: 'eq' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~
In file included from /git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:58:0:
/git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h:451:31: note: 'eq' was
declared here
struct lpfc_queue *wq, *cq, *eq;
^~
In file included from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
from /git/arm-soc/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:44,
from /git/arm-soc/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:5,
from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/sched.h:11,
from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/blkdev.h:4,
from /git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:23:
/git/arm-soc/include/linux/printk.h:301:2: error: 'eq' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~
In file included from /git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:58:0:
/git/arm-soc/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.h:451:31: note: 'eq' was
declared here
struct lpfc_queue *wq, *cq, *eq;
^~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists