lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ef4c01d-75bc-17dc-8926-2f9647cfeec8@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2017 17:51:19 -0400
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 4/5] PCI: Handle CRS ("device not ready") returned by
 device after FLR

On 8/23/2017 5:38 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> If we increase the timeout, is there still value in adding the
> pci_bus_wait_crs() stuff?  I'm not sure there is.

I agree increasing the timeout is more than enough for FLR case. 

However, I was considering the wait and pending functions as a utility
that I can reuse towards fixing CRS in other conditions like secondary
bus reset and potentially PM.

I'm planning to have a CRS session in the Linux Plumbers Conference 
to talk about CRS use cases. 

I was going to follow up this series with secondary bus reset next once
this goes in. 

I'm unable to test PM. I can't promise how I fix/test it.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ