[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ef4c01d-75bc-17dc-8926-2f9647cfeec8@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 17:51:19 -0400
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 4/5] PCI: Handle CRS ("device not ready") returned by
device after FLR
On 8/23/2017 5:38 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> If we increase the timeout, is there still value in adding the
> pci_bus_wait_crs() stuff? I'm not sure there is.
I agree increasing the timeout is more than enough for FLR case.
However, I was considering the wait and pending functions as a utility
that I can reuse towards fixing CRS in other conditions like secondary
bus reset and potentially PM.
I'm planning to have a CRS session in the Linux Plumbers Conference
to talk about CRS use cases.
I was going to follow up this series with secondary bus reset next once
this goes in.
I'm unable to test PM. I can't promise how I fix/test it.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists