[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1503536763-14912-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:06:01 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: joel.opensrc@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
juri.lelli@...il.com, kernel-team@....com
Subject: [PATCH v10 0/2] Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology
Change from v9
-. modify a comment a bit so to be more clear
Change from v8
-. add suggested-by Peterz
-. add several comments
Change from v7
-. fix a trivial typo
-. modify commit messages to explain what it does more clearly
-. simplify code with an existing macro
Change from v6
-. add a comment about selection of fallback_cpu incase more than one exist
-. modify a comment explaining what we do wrt PREFER_SIBLING
Change from v5
-. exclude two patches already picked up by peterz
(sched/deadline: Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology)
(sched/deadline: Change return value of cpudl_find())
-. apply what peterz fixed for 'prefer sibling', into deadline and rt
Change from v4
-. remove a patch that might cause huge lock contention
(by spin lock(&cpudl.lock) in a hot path of scheduler)
Change from v3
-. rename closest_cpu to best_cpu so that it align with rt
-. protect referring cpudl.elements with cpudl.lock
-. change return value of cpudl_find() to bool
Change from v2
-. add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING
Change from v1
-. clean up the patch
Byungchul Park (2):
sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq()
sched/rt: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_lowest_rq()
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
kernel/sched/rt.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists