linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] iwlwifi: pcie: move rx workqueue initialization to iwl_trans_pcie

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1503554432.15969.415.camel@coelho.fi>
Date:   Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:00:32 +0300
From:   Luca Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>
To:     jikos@...nel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxwifi@...el.com,
        rui.zhang@...el.com, edubezval@...il.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        david.weinehall@...el.com, johannes.berg@...el.com,
        kvalo@...eaurora.org, sara.sharon@...el.com,
        emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iwlwifi: pcie: move rx workqueue initialization to
 iwl_trans_pcie_alloc()

On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 10:37 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> From: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
> 
> Work queues cannot be allocated when a mutex is held because the mutex
> may be in use and that would make it sleep.  Doing so generates the
> following splat with 4.13+:
> 
> [   19.513298] ======================================================
> [   19.513429] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> [   19.513557] 4.13.0-rc5+ #6 Not tainted
> [   19.513638] ------------------------------------------------------
> [   19.513767] cpuhp/0/12 is trying to acquire lock:
> [   19.513867]  (&tz->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff924afebb>] thermal_zone_get_temp+0x5b/0xb0
> [   19.514047]
> [   19.514047] but task is already holding lock:
> [   19.514166]  (cpuhp_state){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff91cc4baa>] cpuhp_thread_fun+0x3a/0x210
> [   19.514338]
> [   19.514338] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> 
> This lock dependency already existed with previous kernel versions,
> but it was not detected until commit 49dfe2a67797 ("cpuhotplug: Link
> lock stacks for hotplug callbacks") was introduced.
> 
> Reported-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>

Jiri, did you have a chance to try this out? I'm about to ask Kalle to
merge this so it gets in in time for 4.13-rc7.

--
Cheers,
Luca.