linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:53:48 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, mchehab@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
        lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_platform_list()

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 04:54:43PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> ACPI OEM ID / OEM Table ID / Revision can be used to identify
> a platform based on ACPI firmware info.  acpi_blacklisted(),
> intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists(), and some other funcs,
> have been using similar check to detect a list of platforms
> that require special handlings.
> 
> Move the platform check in acpi_blacklisted() to a new common
> utility function, acpi_match_platform_list(), so that other
> drivers do not have to implement their own version.
> 
> There is no change in functionality.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/blacklist.c |   83 ++++++++--------------------------------------
>  drivers/acpi/utils.c     |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/acpi.h     |   19 +++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)

...

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> index b9d956c..0a9e597 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> @@ -816,3 +816,39 @@ static int __init acpi_backlight(char *str)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  __setup("acpi_backlight=", acpi_backlight);
> +
> +/**
> + * acpi_match_platform_list - Check if the system matches with a given list
> + * @plat: pointer to acpi_platform_list table terminated by a NULL entry
> + *
> + * Return the matched index if the system is found in the platform list.
> + * Otherwise, return a negative error code.
> + */
> +int acpi_match_platform_list(const struct acpi_platform_list *plat)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_table_header hdr;
> +	int idx = 0;
> +
> +	if (acpi_disabled)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	for (; plat->oem_id[0]; plat++, idx++) {
> +		if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_table_header(plat->table, 0, &hdr)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (strncmp(plat->oem_id, hdr.oem_id, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (strncmp(plat->oem_table_id, hdr.oem_table_id, ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if ((plat->pred == all_versions) ||
> +		    (plat->pred == less_than_or_equal && hdr.oem_revision <= plat->oem_revision) ||
> +		    (plat->pred == greater_than_or_equal && hdr.oem_revision >= plat->oem_revision) ||
> +		    (plat->pred == equal && hdr.oem_revision == plat->oem_revision))

If you align the second part of the test like this:

             if ((plat->pred == all_versions) ||
                 (plat->pred == less_than_or_equal	&& hdr.oem_revision <= plat->oem_revision) ||
                 (plat->pred == greater_than_or_equal	&& hdr.oem_revision >= plat->oem_revision) ||
                 (plat->pred == equal			&& hdr.oem_revision == plat->oem_revision))

it gets maximally readable. But I'd leave that up to Rafael when committing
- no need to send another version.

Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.