lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 Aug 2017 08:15:30 +0000
From:   Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@....com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...sity.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the akpm-current tree

Hi Andrew,

On 2017/8/24 15:42, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew, After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next
> build (x86_64 allmodconfig) produced these warnings:
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c: In function 'dlm_free_dead_locks':
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c:2306:6: warning: unused variable 'i'
> [-Wunused-variable] int i; ^ fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c:2305:20:
> warning: unused variable 'queue' [-Wunused-variable] struct list_head
> *queue = NULL; ^ 
My patch never defines these two variables, it's strange that they are
defined within the patch you collected.
Could you please help to check if this patch comes from mail '[PATCH]
ocfs2: re-queue AST or BAST if sending is failed to improve the
reliability' sent on 7, August.

Thanks,
Changwei
> Caused by commit
>
>   d09f2c6cf3b8 ("ocfs2: re-queue AST or BAST if sending is failed to improve the reliability")
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ